A bit of background: Em dashes “—” (or, very often, double em-dashes “——”) are to Chinese texts what hyphens “-” are to English texts. We use them in ranges “魯迅(1881-1936)”, in name concatenations “任-洛二氏溶液(Ringer-Locke solution)”, to express sounds “呜——”火车开动了, or `“Chouuuuuuuuu”, starts the train' in English, and in place of sentence breaks like this——just like em dashes in English texts. They are so commonly used that most Chinese input methods map Shift+- (i.e., underscores “_”) to double em-dashes. So, as a result, while I see many English people have to resort to weird sequences like “Alt + 0151” for an em-dash, a huge population in the world actually has no difficulty in using em-dashes. What a surprise!
As for this article, obviously it was translated from its Chinese version, so, yeah I don't see em-dashes as an AI indicator. And for the weird emoji “” (U+1F54A), I'm fairly certain that it comes from the Chinese idiom “放鸽子” (stand someone up, or, literally, release doves/pigeons), which has evolved into “鸽了” (pigeon'ed), a humorous way to say “delayed, sorry!”.
On another note, it may be useful to you to know that in most English dialects, referring to a person solely by their nationality (e.g., when you wrote "as a Chinese") is considered rude or uncouth, and it may mark your speech/writing as non-native. It is generally preferable to use nationalities as adjective rather than nouns (e.g., "as a Chinese person"). The two main exceptions are when employing metonymy, such as when referring to a nation's government colloquially (e.g., "the Chinese will attend the upcoming UN summit") or when using the nationality to indicate broad trends among the population of the nation (e.g., "the Chinese sure know how to cook!"). I hope this is considered a helpful interjection rather than an unwelcome one, but if not, I apologize!
I don’t think that applies when referring to yourself, as the parent did.
Speaking of personal devices, I also have a dedicated key binding for en dashes “–” (because, well, I already have a whole tap layer for APL symbols, and it costs nothing to add one more). Since we're on HN, I believe many people here can easily do that if they wish to, so I too don't think en/em dashes are very telling, especially on HN.
(...and of course we have an xkcd for it: https://xkcd.com/3126/ )
In fact, complement is a concept in counting systems, and the Chinese term for it is "complement".
I dislike that people think you're an AI if you're using proper typography. :(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrTrOCQZoQE
The Ubuntu repositories curate both the legacy and more modern logisim fork:
sudo apt-get install logisim
sudo snap install logisim-evolution
Microcap 12 is also still available from the archive.org web cache, was made free, and runs in Wine64 just fine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20230214034946/http://www.spectr...
Microcap will handle both Analog and Digital simulations.
KiCad now also supports Spice, and reports it should import the free LTSpice libraries. I have yet to find a use case for the kicad sim option... so YMMV.
https://www.kicad.org/discover/spice/
Best of luck, =3
Many proper uses of the em-dash put two words visually together—despite being parts of two distinct units separated by the em-dash.
I much prefer using a normal dash with a space on each side - like this.
After all AI didn't pick up these habits out of nowhere - all the tells are good writing advice and professional typography, but used with a frequency you would only see in highly polished texts like marketing copy