I feel like this is nothing more than a side effect of what happened with Covid.
Which would mean if we were willing to shut things down like we did we should be willing to take the secondary effects and solve those problems too.
Which would mean if we were willing to shut things down like we did we should be willing to take the secondary effects and solve those problems too.
On the other hand, negative performance trends started in the early 2010s, and this may be more associated with the phone-based childhood.
Your take is stupid, that's how discourse goes now though, stupid hot takes from people who don't want to think, ponied up as some grand opinion while padded with derision and cynicism.
It's just stupid... And quite tiresome, be better.
My take is not stupid. I saw the damage shutdowns caused personally. It’s offensive to me that you call my lived experience a “stupid hot take”.
But, would the procedure have helped if the surgery was expected to cause COVID exposure, and the patient could have that severe respiratory illness during their surgical recovery? Would it be a good outcome if the surgical staff were dropping like flies with COVID they would get from the regular flow of patients? Alternatively, could the procedure be expected to work as reliably if the staff were wearing all that extra personal protection gear? That is not the conditions under which the procedure was developed and its benefits determined to be worth the risk...
I hope that our global experience produced enough data for someone to come up with better answers before the next novel pandemic. But, I don't know how you plow through all the inconsistencies in the data to come to any statistically valid conclusions. I.e. we have different regions/subpopulations who, in effect, ran different arms of an experiment. But, how can we compare their outcomes with sufficient rigor to find clear answers?