You are using an incredibly poor rhetoric technique and setting up a strawman.
This is not about regulating everything.
This is about realizing adverse effects and regulating for those.
Just like no one is selling you toxic youghurt.
This is not about regulating everything.
This is about realizing adverse effects and regulating for those.
Just like no one is selling you toxic youghurt.
We literally CAN'T regulate some things for any reasonable definition of "can't" or "regulate". Our society is either not rich enough or not organized in a way to actually do it in any useful capacity and not make the problem worse.
I'm not saying AI chatbots are one of those things, but people toss around the idea of regulation way too casually and AI chatbots are way less cut and dry than bad food or toxic waste or whatever other extreme anyone wants to misleadingly project down into the long tail of weird stuff with limited upside and potential for unintended consequences elsewhere.
Which people in specific think that?
All your argument consists of is, "Somebody somewhere believes something untrue, and people don't use enough precision in their speach, so I am recommending we don't do anything regulatory about this problem."
The important thing is keep the data safe, like the yoghurt that must not be expired when sold.