Editing to elaborate: If dhh is allowed to have the opinion that (1) you can tell who's a "native Brit" just by looking at them, (2) there are fewer "native Brits" in London these days, and (3) this is a bad thing, then other people are allowed tr have the opinion that dhh is a racist, and by your own logic you can't deride these people for having a different opinion to you.
Other than that; stop putting words in my mouth and stop poisoning the well. You and the OP are strawmanning a claim that the article is written in bad faith and thus avoid engaging with its substance.
I literally quoted you.
> clear definition of fascism ... attitudes as a business leader
Just as well with the dictionary entry. Well done. You got me. Wow. Nah man, saying that the word "fascist" is thrown around as an exaggeration is a thought-terminating cliché deployed in order to flatten the discourse.
You see, your dictionary definition obscures the reality that the pendulum of society is now swinging to the right, hard. He is explicitly aligning himself with a certain political philosophy which in 2025 is dominating the world. DHH isn't just saying some kooky shit, he is in a position of considerable power and visibility actively working to undermine the safety and opportunities of members of the community. It's cringeworthy seeing people standing in solidarity with an entitled idiot but not the marginalized people he hates.
All this is to say, I can't look at everything he's been saying and doing without seeing much of what Umberto Eco has identified as markers of fascism.
https://www.openculture.com/2024/11/umberto-ecos-list-of-the...
I dunno, I find him a far more compelling thinker than the people at Merriam-Webster, no shade intended.