Now if he'd stated "western media covers broadly equivalent events with similar levels of casualties with a bias towards Europe/Western Countries/Western Allies" then broadly I would agree - African news does tend to take a backseat to events in those regions for likely a whole host of reasons.
They covered El-Fasher as well - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgr4qqgdlkjo
Which is double bad since the RSF, the Arab army committing genocide belongs to the same organisation as Hamas does. They are both "descended" from the Muslim brotherhood of Egypt, and receive a LOT of support from Arab countries.
This link says 64,0000 people dead in 2 years in Gaza.
Are you saying more than 64,000 have been massacred in el-Fasher in 7 days?
So yes, news about Israel are more engaging in the US.
It is one thing to read of atrocities commited in an extremely underdeveloped country and another to hear of even notionally smaller ones in an extremely developed one.
> even though it is far worse than anything alleged in the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Hmm. I don't see how this contributes anything, and the two atrocities are linked.
"This other genocide is worse" isn't the amazing insight you think it is.