Hacker News Reader

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition is doing better than ever. All of it remains Free, there's more than ever and more being made than ever and there's more funding and demand than ever.

Only immediate existential threat is political attacks via corrupt laws.

View on HN

Yes, not literally, but after Microsoft bought GitHub and corrupted open source, the meaning of Free Software actually became doing free labor for internet companies and not making tools for humans. Maybe the software is free, but it is only made to create a service and be gatekept rather than exactly making things like Firefox and GIMP and the good old offline days of the past where you had, in a sense, a sort of digital sovereignty. I no longer feel the same in a LUG or community. Maybe that is me, but I just don’t feel Free Software has won; I feel big corporations won in redirecting the labor of Free Software into making paid services. If GNU had won, we would have had an OS X–grade operating system with amazing apps, and yet I don’t find any advancement even in Linux, which is the half-successful dream of GNU. Ubuntu and Firefox failed in making human-centric phones; Ubuntu even failed at making an operating system for people. It’s now advertised as server and IoT, and even Fedora and friends.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com