>Reminds me of the whole discussion around self driving cars. About how people wanted perfection,
sure, if an expert in self driving cars came in and said self driving cars are untrustworthy.
sure, if an expert in self driving cars came in and said self driving cars are untrustworthy.
That's the magic with not setting a mathematically verifiable acceptance criteria. You just fall back to that kind of horrible argument
no I don't think humans are trustworthy, I think the procedures discussed are more secure than the alternative on offer which an expert in that technology described as being untrustworthy, implying that it was less trustworthy than the processes it was offered as an alternative to, and then gave technical reasons why which basically boiled down to the reasons why I expected that alternative would be untrustworthy