Hacker News Reader

Comment by AbstractH24 | Hacker News Reader

So we can all only succeed if we know how CPUs handle individual instructions?

I'm not sure whether I agree with GP, but I think you may be misinterpreting their point. I can have an understanding of CPUs in general without knowing individual instructions, and I do think knowing about things like CPU cache is useful even when writing e.g. Python.

Yes, for sure! And being able to orchestrate AI to use that knowledge provides leverage for fulfilling tasks.

Eventually, yes, I think we'll delegate to AI in more and more complete ways, but it's a process that takes some time.

I see what you’re getting at and it makes sense.

Goes to the larger idea that strategic and logic is important for scalability and long term success. Not just execution. Something LLMs miss often (mostly because people fail to communicate it to them).

Sure, but the comment being worried about a lack of “flexing your muscles” is perfectly countered by moving up an abstraction layer then, as you don’t have to constantly get into the weeds of coding to maintain an understanding _in general_ without knowing individual instructions.

There's generally a pretty quick falloff of how much help knowledge of each layer under you generally provides as you go deeper.

That being said, if you're writing in C, having a pretty good idea of how a cpu generally executes instructions is pretty key to success I'd say.

Agreed, also depends on the scale you are working at.

If you are a tiny startup, the marginal gains from these optimizations matter a lot less than if you are Netflix.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com