These guys are running hyper optimized cash extraction mega machines. There is no comparison to previous bubbles, cause so no such companies ever existed in the past.
These guys are running hyper optimized cash extraction mega machines. There is no comparison to previous bubbles, cause so no such companies ever existed in the past.
It's easy for the techies to see the problems. But advertising results have been very measurable for a very long time by now. Larger advertisers can leave the details to their techies and still be very clear as to their advertising's productivity post-cost of doing business.
Eastern Airways, a UK airline, has just gone bust due to accumulated debts of £26 million. That's not even a rounding error for Google, yet was enough to put a 47-year-old company into bankruptcy and its staff out of work.
I think the only historical parallel to this disparity was the era of the East India Company.
The question is where the profits are.
Microsoft - 14,000 (multiple rounds); significant
Meta - 600 layoffs; insignificant for company size
Google - "Several hundred layoffs"; insignificant for a company size
Apple - No layoffs
Source: https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/24/tech-layoffs-2025-list/
And offshoring is also a huge cost-cutting effort everywhere.
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MSFT/microsoft/ebi...
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/ebitda
Microsoft: desktop software
Meta: social media
Maybe on some technical definitions of "monopoly" these aren't monopolies, but nothing remotely resembling a monopoly? come on maan