Hacker News Reader

Can you expand on what you mean exactly? I see these sentences like your littered throughout reddit, vague notions of violence/war?

View on HN

It was a common argument that ultimately all of the constitutional protections, balance of powers and all that were protected by the Second Amendment - that in the face of losing their liberty, Americans would rise up against an authoritarian government.

Within this administration, a lot of people feel that there has been an assault on constitutional protections, but the people who trumpeted the Second Amendment as being fundamental to protecting American liberty and democracy have largely been silent in the face of it.

It was also avoided for decades as "vile" and now the groups that could most use the 2nd Amendment are (mostly) unarmed.

It was always BS .. the Founders never intended the 2nd Amendment as a means to overthrow the government they created--the Constitution explicitly says that treason can be punished by death. And the people making that argument were always hypocritical about how they would apply it.

It brought to mind the Four Boxes of Liberty[1]. It used to be toted out by conservatives during the gun control debates, but I haven't seen it used by anyone recently until now.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_boxes_of_liberty

Reply on news.ycombinator.com