The monkey paw curls. Now we live in a world where software is nothing but service contracts and more closed than ever.
There's nothing we can do about all that and for practical reasons we just accept the world as is and tend to forget/ignore the reasons it is so. But for retaining cognitive sovereignty if think it's good to remember that.
Indeed, and that software ends up optimized for service contract billing potential over usability.
While we could not prove anything, it would seem that intellectual property theft just happens.
Today, we use tools daily that probably function because of intellectual property theft.
While this is traumatic to me, if I really try to be objective, aside from the additional theft of art, I don’t see how this is much different than what RMS and FSF stood for. Data finds a way to free itself.
Somehow we expect FLOSS coders and maintainers to do all this free labour to keep companies from paying the True Cost of everything. Externalities, externalities…
If I ever start another business, I hope I can set aside enough cash to support for the primary open-source tools that we depend on.
We regularly found IPs linked to large companies using it and the licensing team regularly had a field day. Universities basically got a stern letter because there is no money in chasing those, but large companies certainly got contacted by licensing compliance.
That is web scraping is the SaaS form of 'piracy'.