https://github.com/golithus/minio-builds
Example use:
docker run -p 9000:9000 -p 9001:9001 ghcr.io/golithus/minio:latest
[0]: https://lithus.euhttps://github.com/golithus/minio-builds
Example use:
docker run -p 9000:9000 -p 9001:9001 ghcr.io/golithus/minio:latest
[0]: https://lithus.euI see both sides of the argument here, the people maintaining minio should not have to push docker images for free, it is work to maintain and test, especially across all the host platforms. And, this work isn't that complicated if you want to do it yourself.
https://github.com/golithus/minio-builds/blob/main/Dockerfil...
And it is very true. Although the binary does also need building, which is also handled in the above actions workflow.
I don't. It's automated, it needs approximately zero attention. This is just a company that got where it was benefitting from open source taking the free toys away thinking there'll be profit in it.
Python and pip are just bad at this.
Passing a GPU through into a docker container requires a lot of permissions and flags to be set up just right, and it's way more difficult if your host operating system isn't natively Linux.
What you're describing is essentially the most difficult imaginable container to maintain.
Maintaining a normal containerized application, especially if you want to put it in maintenance mode forever and basically just leave the container working the same way with up to date code... is essentially zero effort. A few hours a year by one person and certainly something open source that a contributor would be happy to be responsible for.
This isn't the case of a company saving money or time by stopping supporting some onerous container build... they're intentionally kneecapping the open source offering hoping more people will pay for their product, which is scummy.
I had positive feelings about minio until I read this, now I don't want to touch it expecting whatever is next to be even more annoying whether I was paying them or not.