Hacker News Reader

The models are always wrong. It's virtually impossible to model something with an impossible amount of unknown inputs. Even accurately measuring the Earth over time is a joke. Unfortunately the models are presented in pop science and mainstream culture as accurate or something that we should use to create public policy.

View on HN

What should we base public policy on instead?

Having less people .

> It's virtually impossible to model something with an impossible amount of unknown inputs.

Nah. We have a pretty good idea of what the main unknowns in climate are, and they have an associated uncertainty range. Yes, it's a lot of work to model such systems with a useful level of accuracy, but "a lot of work" is very far from "virtually impossible". ?

If the climate was that unpredictable, then the Earth would be uninhabitable.

(FWIW, I do computational modeling for work - not in climate, though - and you would not believe how much misinformation there is about modeling from conservatives)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com