Toss that with the seemingly OBVIOUS throttling due to non-existent forced air cooling that nearly every fanboy bench tester has given a pass for. 15 years ago NO ONE would have tolerated a 40% performance drop after heatsoaking.
Toss that with the seemingly OBVIOUS throttling due to non-existent forced air cooling that nearly every fanboy bench tester has given a pass for. 15 years ago NO ONE would have tolerated a 40% performance drop after heatsoaking.
What workloads are you envisioning where this is a problem and if throttling kicks in does it make ui/os laggy, or just reduce throughput (the former being noticeable where the latter is just mean longer wait of say a rendering job or something). I'm guessing maybe gaming is the issue, but i don't think anyone really buys a mac to game.
Much more noticeably, however is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225U which is about half the performance as an M4.
However, the $900 MacBook is not the one with the large screen, right? That costs much more money, right? It doesn’t make sense to compare a small laptop with a large laptop. Even if they are in the same price range, consumers aren’t really choosing between the two.
The RAM size is barely an issue because the OS has had excellent efficiency from coming from phone engineering. I've had 16 gig for years and never had a problem.
Nah they just aren't charging apple tax. "Bad" ssd (which imo are still amazing) are dirt cheap these days.
I'm on a 36gb M3 and I have to reboot it every three to five days to have it behave again.
I have normal dev apps open: a browser with jira, another with testing, another with documentation, an ide, teams, calendar, zoom.. it adds up very, very quickly. 16gigs are gone in the blink of an eye
I've a lot of experience with owning both Windows and Apple laptops for a long time.