Or do you immediately just stop reading if you even sense it was AI generated?
If someone doesn’t think it’s worth their time to write it, it’s definitely not worth my time to read it.
Other articles need to be, as I've said of books, they are good because they (their chapters) are coherent, consistent and complete. Concise helps a lot.
This requires an understanding of narrative: envisioning the goal, how pieces build towards it, attention to detail, and importantly, understanding how humans process information to create understanding and meaning.
It takes one to know one.
No, but, there's a bunch of new rules. The first being that it's all hallucinated; or worse fraudulent. Take this link for example, clearly fraudulent.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45538768
So AI basically cant tell a story. Cant touch of anything subjective.
But this leaves open people who simply rewrite for better grammar and wordage.
>Or do you immediately just stop reading if you even sense it was AI generated?
No, not the article. I'll read something that caught my attention regardless of if they used spell check or another tool like AI.
Much of canadian journalism is AI written now. Papers that I used to like suddenly dropped in quality so much that now i stopped reading.
Very noticable because most AI models cant write Canadian english and get significant things wrong that are true in the usa but not true in canada. That if humans were writing it, they wouldnt make those mistakes.