> because the risk of the models being abused or trafficked is virtually zero.
That's not really true. Look at one if the more common uses for AI porn: taking a photo of someone and making them nude.
Deepfake porn exists and it does harm
That's not really true. Look at one if the more common uses for AI porn: taking a photo of someone and making them nude.
Deepfake porn exists and it does harm
I was just pointing out that when you're talking about the scale of harm caused by the existing sex industry compared to the scale of harm caused by AI generated pornographic imagery, one far outweighs the other.
What if you get a model that is 99% similar to your “target” - what we do with that?
Before only rich can afford to pay a pro to do photoshop. Now any poor person can get.
So why when rich can is fine and when everyone can is a problem?