An example of the bias:
> shows that 95% of professionals now use AI at work or home
Obviously 95% of professionals don't use AI at work or home, and these results are heavily skewed.
There's a big difference between using it like Google and really enhancing your workflow with it by automating parts of your work.
Maybe the 33 people who said "No" doesn't know the implementation details so they assume it's not used anywhere in their daily professional life.
So, I would have to take reporting on safety with a grain of salt. That said, I do think there are a lot of other interesting insights throughout the presentation.
I'd wager at least 90% of the survey respondents are Americans or live in the US, so that already skews the data a ton!
Looka like they just asked their target audience. Which is highly biased, to say the least. And renders their large sample almost useless.
But other than that only AI use is when google forces it on me. And then gets things wrong... Which is easily found out by comparing it's output and synopsis on the links it give...