Apple Wants More Damages, U.S. Sales Ban Against Samsung
mashable.com
mashable.com
I understand that the USA is a huge market, but it seems like the rest of the world is catching up in a lot of ways (centers of excellence in science and R&D in the Orient, India, and Europe; also: so-called 3rd world countries getting larger highly educated and motivated workers; growing affluence in previously 3rd world countries == they become better customers).
Apple has not been doing as well patent trolling outside of the USA.
When I explain the Apple patent problem to non-technical family and friends I usually couch it by describing how we in the USA are losing our tech edge and Apple's behavior will help speed up our decline relative to the rest of the world. In other words, don't be proud of Apple as a USA company, but rather understand how their actions will hurt our country.
On a more positive note: I now view myself more as a citizen of the world rather than a citizen particular tax jurisdiction, like the USA. I believe that open source technology and products based on open source and open standards will eventually win out. The world should be a level playing field, and people and companies should prosper based on the quality of their work, skills, and general productivity. A lot of people I know believe that our world history has entered a phase of continuous, never ending series of wars that make the world's elite even wealthier. Contrary to that, I believe/hope that there will be enough people (and yes, even corporations) that do the right thing and probably things will turn out well for more people around the world.
Sorry for the off topic rant.
I actually hope they do. That would be one way in which it would be clear for everybody that this is not the way to go.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/10/hp-spectre-one-all-in-one...
The only other major problem is that Linux desktop environments aren't configured very nicely out of the box (If you're used to OS X). I've been happiest with kubuntu so far, but it's taken a few hours to get it set up the way I like it.
And when you see someone without a mac these days, the first assumption isn't that they lack style, it's that they are willing to compromise on another machine in order to not support Apple's patent warfare.
You're not taking into account that there are many of us who prefer ThinkPads (or other PC hardware) over Mac hardware and prefer Windows 7 or Linux over OSX. We're not "compromising" on another machine, we're choosing the machine that best suits our needs.
Of course, every machine and OS has its own compromises. As much as I love ThinkPads, Lenovo has really cheaped out on the display panels the last several years. I hope the Retina MacBook spurs them into returning to the high-quality displays ThinkPads used to offer.
But still, I enjoy using my ThinkPads and Windows much more than I enjoy my Macs. I find them more pleasant to use and more productive. A notebook without a TrackPoint [1] has no appeal for me.
When I see someone using a Mac, I don't assume that they bought a machine for style and are unaware of how superior a ThinkPad would be. I assume that the Mac meets their needs better than the ThinkPad would. After all, I only know my own needs and preferences, not theirs.
What I've never understood is why so many in the Mac-loving tech community have looked with such disdain on people who prefer other systems. I respect people who choose Macs over ThinkPads; it would be nice to receive that same respect in return.
(Don't get me wrong, I didn't take your comment as being disrespectful; I'm just talking about an attitude I've gotten from other Mac enthusiasts from time to time.)
It's certainly a natural human tendency to feel that "my stuff is better than your stuff." I'm no saint myself and I have to make a conscious effort to see that other people's choices are as valid as mine.
Sorry, yeah, I didn't mean to say that. I was trying to say that there is a strong "style" element in picking a machine. People should be rational as you say and pick the one that is better for them, but often whichever is "cooler" is more important - again, until recently, having a non-MacBook in certain circles would get you odd stares and you would feel like you didn't fit in. That seems to be changing now though.
Did you ever see the movie Legally Blonde? There was a funny scene where Elle was tired of being seen as a dumb blonde, so she bought a MacBook of whatever vintage they made back then and brought it to class. (She was wearing her Playboy bunny outfit when she bought the machine, but that's another story!)
She took the Mac to class and there was one great shot of the whole class from the front of the classroom - so what you saw was the top lids of everyone's laptops. They were all solid black - presumably ThinkPads but they hid the logos - and she had the one lone Apple logo. Guess she didn't fit in after all!
How times change... :-)
Then again, if they know so much and are so key to Apple maybe they are a huge competitive threat.
It feels weird to me to even say that but it's true. I played around with my boss's new iPhone 5 on Friday and was pretty surprised that it seems nearly featureless aside from power. The features are in the power, in the fact that they give the software (90% of this is relevant to gaming) more capability. This is the ultimate upgrade to whatever existed, but if I was hardware-naive and I saw an iPhone 5 and a Galaxy S3 side by side, I'd think the iPhone 5 must have come out a year earlier for all the features it lacks.
This is the year I stopped telling people "iPhone" when they ask me what smartphone they should get, and Samsung's line is probably the biggest reason why.
- Smart Stay
- NFC
- Attaching files to an email that aren't "Apple approved" formats
- Access to the filesystem
- Countless mix and match wireless transfer and sync features
Honest questions no trolling
The NFC feature is pretty subjective. If one lives in a part of the world where other sectors have not made use of the technology, then it's quite useless in that case.
Similar example - 4G LTE is practically useless for most South Asian, African and South American countries. In fact, I'm fairly sure there are places in the west without 4G LTE connectivity as well.
Since then, he does not want an iPhone anymore. I did the transition myself 2 years ago, and I have never looked back. What you loose in UX/Eye Candy (even if Android is doing better now), you win in freedom.
PS: it is a genuine question, I don't see how to do it from my experience.
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/izip-zip-unzip-unrar-tool/id4...
They seem to be trying to create a monopoly - implicitly making an effort to stop companies both big and small - start-ups from innovating. They seem to fear competition.
This patent issues among all these big companies is starting to hurt a lot.
Again, these are not "patent wars", these are royalty negotiations, and this was how it was done among the phone makers long before Apple had a phone. The only thing different is that you're paying attention, while Apple doesn't just cave to pay royalties it doesn't think it owes such as for FRAND patents or patents licensed through purchase of licensed chips.
I don't understand why Apple's demise would be bad for the other major players in the mobile sphere.
[1] http://appchronicles.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/lawsuits...