This is for when you need to guarantee that your services cannot possibly escape boundaries of a specific country.
> A sovereign US cloud does not address or mitigate the strategic reliance of European businesses and governments on US-based cloud providers.
> Some commentators are therefore calling those attempts “Sovereign-Cloud-Washing” or “EUWashing”.
You should not host the critical data on other country's servers.
Does absolutely jack shit about the blocs trade deficit in the cloud services space though. Hundreds of billions of euros being sent abroad every year.
Without some kind of collective trade policy [1] sovereign cloud initiatives will continue to be a waste of time for everyone involved (including engineers). Also if you see the phrase Gaia-X ... run.
1. https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/now-how-to-get-that-europe...
There is still a lot missing, and tbh the s3 did not work great when I tested it.
AWS has way more managed business logic. Directory services, authentication, serverless PaaS, virtual workstations, data lakes, code deployment, the list goes on and on.
Load balancers and firewalls are extremely basic in comparison.
I mean it is not really "cloud" compared to larger ones, just a toy but they are building things now.
Whether it has enough features to satisfy your needs is another question, but it is more than just bare metal or vps
The most basic thing with a load balancer and scale instances behind that.
They don't have any of that.
As compared to a "traditional" offering where there's only a manual order form and getting a new server might take hours, making auto-scaling unfeasible