Is it a matter of liability? Like I could definitely see a big issue with mistakes — even if it was just operator error.
Is it a matter of liability? Like I could definitely see a big issue with mistakes — even if it was just operator error.
Even the revision of yearly variables is a considerable task.
At least, some of the complications in these are not intentional, but result of centuries old evolution of these systems.
Maritime shipping uses centuries old systems to handle costs in shipping accidents for example. I forgot the exact name of the system, but while the method is extremely fair, it's equally complicated. The whole premise stems from "This ship has sailed because you wanted me to carry your cargo", and becomes something mind boggling.
I'm sure there are some steps taken to keep people busy, but chalking up everything to it is unfair and wrong.
I have heard and seen enough horror stories about employee pushback on different scales against automation and simplification.
https://opentaxsolver.sourceforge.net/
The UI leaves a lot to be desired, but it does work and I used it one year.
No, government builds all kinds of IT systems for a wide range of sensitive functions, and they certainly have the means to build or fund an open source tax filing system.
The reason they don’t is twofold: A) massive corporate interests lobby the government to ensure projects like this don’t happen, and B) building functional infrastructure for the people goes against certain political narratives that government is useless and wasteful. If you campaign on the idea that government is inept and wasteful, you’re not likely to support projects that undermine your platform.