Also we didn’t just try that with gambling (48 states have had some legal form of it forever) we just tried it with online sports books, which turn out to be a particularly virulent form of gambling. And we haven’t really begun to sensibly regulate that, a lot of harm may be reduced in the near future as we do.
Now they do; make it legal and in two generations it won't be viewed that way because, after all, it's legal!
Get your first dose for free! Refer a friend and get more free shots! Every tenth shot for free!
Also Coca-Cola should be allowed to use a real coke extract. I doubt they will as they cannot even use a real sugar in USA anymore.
They do. It's bought from a Peruvian state-owned company and the cocaine is extracted for medical use.
Some countries don’t even allow advertising legal and OTC pharmaceuticals.
In the last case gambling is pretty much everywhere in all developed societies.
These are pure gamblimg, the skill part is thinly weiled excuse having little to do with the reality. Even if it was skilled, it would still be gambling, but for the most part it is not skilled.
> or gambling as in trading?
Yeah many small investors treat it as a pure gambling. But investing has more regulations and somewhat saner culture. The companies are not intentionally trying to identify and hook addicts deeper and deeper.
Which "sports" literally do.
"Games of skill" in this context essentially always refers to poker, which is demonstrably not "pure gambling".
>Yeah many small investors treat it as a pure gambling. But investing has more regulations and somewhat saner culture. The companies are not intentionally trying to identify and hook addicts deeper and deeper.
>Which "sports" literally do.
This was perhaps largely true in the pre-robinhood era, now it's hard to draw any meaningful distinction between sports gambling and daytrading.