They are a hard nosed company focused with precision on dominance for themselves.
Did they ever open source anything that really make you think "wow"? The best I could see was them "embracing" Linux, but embrace, extend, extinguish was always a core part of their strategy.
- EU governments keep auditing us, so we gotta stay on our toes, do things by the book, and be auditable - it's bad press when we get caught doing garbage like that. And bad press is bad for business
In my org, doing anything with customer's data that isn't directly bringing them value is theoretically not possible. You can't deliver anything that isn't approved by privacy.
Don't forget that this is a very big company. It's composed of people who actually care and want to do the right thing, people who don't really care and just want to ship and would rather not be impeded by compliance processes, and people who are actually trying to bypass these processes because they'd sell your soul for a couple bucks if they could. For the little people like me, the official stance is that we should care about privacy very much.
Our respect for privacy was one of the main reasons I'm still there. There has been a good period of time where the actual sentiment was "we're the good guys", especially when comparing to google and Facebook. A solid portion of that was that our revenue was driven by subscriptions rather than ads. I guess the appeal to take customer's money and exploit their data is too big. The kind of shit that will get me to leave.
How long has MS been putting ads in the start menu?
Even Bill Gates dumped the Windows Phone and switched to Android (he prefers the Samsung Galaxy Fold4)
https://www.gearbrain.com/bill-gates-windows-phone-android-2...
Erm, dude ....
IANAL, and I am sure most people do not need to be lawyers to figure out that not allowing people to permanently opt-out of photo scanning is almost certainly going to be in contravention of every EU law in the book.
I hope the EU take Microsoft to the cleaners over this one.
I understand that the company doesn't get the benefit of the doubt in such situations, especially when publicists "choose not to answer" why this feature is done like that. Great job there...
I'm also hoping we get a correction, be it the EU or just PR backlash. As I said, this is the kind of shit that makes me not want to have my name associated with the company.
The edges and frontiers are what bug me. AI mania is a pox.
Any company that has to state that they take privacy very seriously, doesn't.
The rest of your response makes that very clear: you are focused on doing things by the book, i.e. the bare minimum required by law instead of actually giving one shit about privacy and security yourself.
Meanwhile Apple is applying different set of toxic patterns. Lack of interoperability with other OS, their apps try to store data mainly on iCloud, iPhone has no jack connector etc.
I don't know what this Microsoft thing is that you speak of. I only know a company called Copilot Prime.
Everything I see from that company is farcical. Massive security lapses, lazy AI features with huge privacy flaws, steamrolling OS updates that add no value whatsoever, and heavily relying on their old playbook of just buying anything that looks like it could disrupt them.
P.S. The skype acquisition was $8.5B in 2011 (That's $12.24B in today's money.)
Oh what time does to things!