By vibe coding exposure, of course! Loader is something Claude likes to make that way as one example. Also, take a look at the code and comments (disregarding that readme is obvious aigen)

https://github.com/edmundsparrow/gnokestation/tree/main

You can tell by the colors, the icons, the font...most Claude Code apps from scratch will look roughly like this.

Only a human can see the disproportionality between the amount of work and the point of it. I, a human, tried it and thought: why does this exist? It's providing nothing. For example, there's a clock "app": but why and how? No human would consider the clock inside of this to be convenient.

The blue/purple gradient is a Claude favourite.

Also CSS animation with stuff fading in and moving in Y axis.

The blue-purple gradient alone is a dead giveaway[0].

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG_791Y-vs4 (The AI Purple Problem)

Readme doesn't say much though.

Upon glancing through the code - yep, AI slop. Fine I guess. It's hacker news, not programmer news.

https://github.com/edmundsparrow/gnokestation/tree/main

Still not clear why not just take any webassembly-friendly UI framework like https://www.egui.rs/ (btw compare how much faster it starts).

Machine language generated by compilers is compiler slop.