Strong agreement.
I came at C after doing 6502 and 8086 assembler. Pointers just made sense because working with indirect addressing and understanding how things were stored in memory already made sense.
I came at C after doing 6502 and 8086 assembler. Pointers just made sense because working with indirect addressing and understanding how things were stored in memory already made sense.
What does academia believe, then? I don't know what the negation of "If you know something you can teach it" is.
That if you don't know something, then you can't teach it?
That if you know something you can't teach it?
That if you don't know something you can teach it?
It's obviously "If you don't know something, you can't teach it."