Thin post with marketing fluff and barely more content than its ~5 social media embeds. You can skip this link without missing anything.
Well, that's exactly what you would expect from a national broadcaster's post about a technical news anyway. Not sure why it's been posted here, the target audience is obviously completely different.
Maximum fluff. I will be very surprised if this turns out as anything but a bad attempt at bullshido.
Reminds me of the marketing for a really bad movie:
- “genius”
- “the missing link”
- “breaks the barrier”
Thanks. Certainly lots of work seems to have gone into this, but if they had any good results they would be front and centre. Skimming the paper, I can only see model architectural details and some links they try to make to biology. That makes me doubt they actually got anything useful.
> Our son ran into the room where the project was running, he looked at the screen, and shouted 'Mommy, it has a brain!' We came to see what was going on - and onscreen we saw a structure that hadn't been set by us, but had grown on its own, actually resembling a brain scan.
lmao
Yeah, that was bizarre
Well, after all Poles were co-founders of OpenAI, so maybe another disruption is incoming