> Because labor protection costs money
Labor protection does not "cost money". It is a limit on the degree to which workers can be exploited.
Labor protection does not "cost money". It is a limit on the degree to which workers can be exploited.
Correct, at the time it was about a 50% increase. However, given my food & shelter costs it would have ended up being more expensive for me to live in California.
The post I replied to was about high levels of taxation, which exist in the US also (the treatment of capital gains would have been much more favourable to me).