"A wealth tax would be unpopular because you'd still need to raise the retirement age"
followed immediately by
"the country will have to raise its absurdly low retirement age"
Such a pathetic argument that it doesn't even get an author name attached
followed immediately by
"the country will have to raise its absurdly low retirement age"
Such a pathetic argument that it doesn't even get an author name attached
The Economist is very intentional with their editorial stance.
If you're curious, it is worth reading why their writers are anonymous: https://medium.economist.com/why-are-the-economists-writers-...