Except he actually gives the proof.
Although anecdotal, that information is useful if you care about the state of the Linux desktop for any of a variety of reasons.
Though the real reason it's getting upvoted, I think, is: he has fabulous style. The post reads like a narrative, and he doesn't digress. And he has really clever subtitles and a great title.
Because, sorry, but Apple's spirit is in direct opposition with the natural grain of hackers, even in a broad and "entrepreneurial" sense of the word.
For some reason, people have begun confusing "hacker" with "tinkerer".
I don't think it is in the hacker spirit to trade any bit of said "ease of use" against their control over the hardware or software tools they own.
Heck, even Windows is much more in line with hacker spirit than Apple. In PC boxes you could plug your own cards, develop your own driver, etc. Just look at an Apple product, from last month or from 10 years ago: you cannot open it, you are not supposed to install another OS, you can't even change the battery on their phones. And I even didn't start scratching the surface.
I loved hosting my website through GoDaddy for two days as well.
Now if Linux drivers for laptops have finally settled down after 11 years, I can see myself move back to Linux. That's an interesting alternative if the hardware is as good as Apple hardware and less expensive.
But since Apple started to take their developers as hostages (app store) and consumers too (closed systems like iPhone, iPad), I honestly think about linux on a Thinkpad again - or a Vaio. If we could only get Photoshop for linux...
Why are you guys complaining about a guy choosing Linux over Mac? Is it because of the sentiment? :-)