All these people that go "it just predicts words" seem to be very certain that the brain does something else.
LLMs find the most likely next word based on its billions of previously scanned word combinations and contexts. It's an entirely different process.
They do not "think", they "language", i.e. large language model.
This sort of Socratic questioning shows that no one truly can answer them because no one actually knows about the human mind, or how to distinguish or even define intelligence.
I don't think we know. Or if we have theories, the error bars are massive.
>LLMs find the most likely next word based on its billions of previously scanned word combinations and contexts. It's an entirely different process.
How is that different than using one's learned vocabulary?