The way I assess results in a familiar programming language is by reviewing and reasoning through the code. Testing is necessary, but not sufficient by any means.
Why this is inherently different?
[1] Side-note: This was written at a time when selling software as a standalone product was not really a thing, so everything was open-source and the "how to modify" part was more about how to read and understand the code, e.g. architecture diagrams.
I'm talking about "shrinkwrap" software like Word or something. There's nothing even close to testing for that this is not just "system testing" it.