Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by logn | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

logn

This is potentially terrible precendent essentially allowing private entities to write federal law.

View on HN

What?

Step 1: Write a ToS for your private entity

Step 2: Catch someone violating it

Step 3: Sic the Feds (government) on them for violating it (your private, unvetted agreement).

(no comment from me personally, but I think that's what the GP was saying.)

That is not how the law works.

I'm pretty sure sneaking into a server closet and patching your computer into their network was already against the law before this incident happened.

It was a janitorial closet, not a server room. And connecting to a network is not illegal.

No, but scraping all the articles off JSTOR using MIT's negotiated access in order to put them onto BitTorrent sure is.

You're asserting that it's legal for you to plug your computer into a piece of networking infrastructure that's clearly not intended for general public use, without the permission of that network's owner?

I'm going to have to slap a [citation needed] on that.

It's the same network that's available elsewhere on campus, so it's not like he was connecting without authorization. Aside from possibly trespassing, what kind of crime would it be?

Are you suggesting that there's a kind of network equipment that you have to trespass to access for which people have a reasonable expectation that they are authorized to use it?

There's no giant sign hanging over the breaker box in my building's elevator room saying "AUTHORIZED USE ONLY", but I'm pretty sure I'd get in trouble if I went in there and started flipping switches.

If I'm a student, and there's a switch in the teachers' lounge that connects to the same network that I am allowed to access in the rest of the school, then I can illicitly enter the teachers' lounge and plug in to that network with the same authorization that I would have outside.

Edit: doesn't have to be wifi.

I don't follow, but then, we're not talking about wifi networks.

The whole reason he (allegedly) plugged into it was that it wasn't the same network. There were rate limits and / or other access restrictions on the wifi that weren't in effect when you plugged directly into the equipment in the closet.

Ever heard of Operation Fastlink, Buccaneer, Site down, etc... The BSA, MPAA and the RIAA's of America have been doing this for years.

Unfortunately, that precedent has been (being) set for some time now.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com