We could grant all that for the sake of argument but it wouldn’t interact with anything I said.

I’m talking specifically about the claim that because individuals with a low exposure to something don’t necessarily have a given outcome, there is no causal pathway between the exposure and the outcome. It’s not clear to me how what you’ve written speaks to anything regarding that claim.

Not trying to be snarky, I just want to be really clear about the point I’m trying to make here.