Hacker News Reader

For example, just because I scan an old book doesn't mean I should own a copyright on the scan.

Just to play devils advocate, why not? Wouldn't that result in many more old books being scanned that otherwise wouldn't be? Wouldn't competition force down the price of the popular old books?

View on HN

That's a backwards way to look at it. Copyright is a very powerful protection, we sacrifice a lot for it (look at all the creativity that's still going on around Sherlock Holmes, or in illegal fanfiction for more recent works, and think how much more creative expression there might be if more cultural icons were without copyright). The bar to justify extending copyright to something new should be set high; I'd rather risk having fewer old books scanned than have someone unable to make a new creative work because he'd got the idea from a scan of an old book that turned out to be copyrighted.

Just think about how George Lucas clearly wasn't the best person to write the Star Wars prequels.

I would gladly pay for a well-written IP-infringing new version of Matrix 2-3 instead of the official crap that the rights owners put out.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com