Think they were off by an order of magnitude for this fine. The PR for reporting anything bad on AI is probably worth more than the fine for non-compliance. 100k would at least start to dent the bumper.
Think they were off by an order of magnitude for this fine. The PR for reporting anything bad on AI is probably worth more than the fine for non-compliance. 100k would at least start to dent the bumper.
- pioneers in wrongness 25 years ago. Oft copied, but never vindicated.
Having a dip and then a return to growth and exceeding the previous peak size isn't exactly a bubble. The internet and tech sector has grown to dominate the global economy. What happened was more of a cyclical correction, or a dip and rebound.
That's exactly what a bubble is. You blow too fast and you get nothing but soap. You blow slow, controlled breaths balancing speed and accuracy and you get a big, sustainable bubble.
No one's saying you can't blow a new bubble, just that this current one isn't long for this world. It's just that the way investments work is that the first bubble popping will scare off a lot of the biggest investors who just want a quick turnaround.
You can have a crash without this having happened.
If you deflate over time slowly (or simply slow growth expectations) you can prevent a pop. That doesn't tend to be what historically happens, though.
Yes. This seems to be what you're doing-- carrying the metaphor too far. I believe the common use relates the asset prices to intrinsic or fundamental values.
Many will crash in rapid succession. There isn’t enough room for all these same-y companies.