I actually noticed that other comment you mentioned and almost said something at that time. The style is just not mentioned much and Python is about 1000x more well known than other offside-rule PLangs like Haskell. There are also enough exceptions, in Nim at least, that a true bracy fan would have at least some disappointments here & there.

In general Nim's syntax affords much, much more choice than Python, from UFCS to user-defined operators to macros to term re-writing macros to etc., etc. It's really a step up from Python in so many ways with a lot of compile-time checking and safety and essentially the same perf as C++. It's a shame it's not a little more popular.