Amazon, Citi, JP Morgan Chase, FAANG, Walmart, Tesla, Oracle and the other usual suspects will be fine if the H-1B program is materially impaired [5] [6].
Most Americans are not benefiting from this system, and so, there is little value in protecting it in my opinion. If another country or company invents the next big thing, copy it. "You can just do things." China has almost mastered reusable space vehicles, for example, no SpaceX required. India can use Zoho instead of Microsoft today if they wish [7] (and probably should).
[1] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cost-of-living-income-quality-o...
[3] https://www.crfb.org/blogs/cbo-estimates-3-trillion-debt-hou...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_...
[5] https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/04/what-we-k...
> A stronger currency is actually a curse, not a benefit
It’s more purchasing power.
The evidence shows this is false. If it wasn't for cost savings, companies could eat the $100k one time H-1B fee (lifetime employee generated revenue - lifetime total employee costs). I am asking you to prove the assertion that the talent does not exist domestically within the US. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
> It’s more purchasing power.
This is less necessary forward looking with global decoupling and de-globalization.
Citations, again: