I agree the article is simplistic.
> "leaders" (the top brass - founders, etc)
They said their definition of leader wasn't about job titles or org charts.
> "leaders" (the top brass - founders, etc)
They said their definition of leader wasn't about job titles or org charts.
So then, who is the article about? And more to the point, if it's not a recipe for success, why should I follow its advice?