After finding out even Think Fast, Slow (a book from a very creditable researcher and nobel laureate) is full of replication crisis, I approach pop-sci as entertainment instead of self-education.
On the other hand, does economics have less of a replication issue because it’s basically unreplicable?
Maybe, but e.g. Millikan's prize for physics was on the basis of results that appear to have been at least partially fabricated.
You can find, maybe, three or four such recipients out of 100. And they usually did make peace, even if they previously or later made mistakes.