Not necessarily true. This might be a Microsoft funding a bankrupt Apple kind of moment.
American competition isn't a zero sum, and it's in Nvidias' best interest to keep the market healthy.
American competition isn't a zero sum, and it's in Nvidias' best interest to keep the market healthy.
Looking at Google's recent antitrust settlement, I'm not sure this is true at present.
the fact that google pay firefox anually meaning that its in best interest of google that there is no monopoly, judge says
So yes. That's how American competition works.
It isn't a zero sum game. We try to create a market environment that is competitive and dynamic.
Monopolies are threat to both the company and a free open dynamic market. If Nvidia feels it could face an antitrust suit, which is reasonable, it is in its best interest to fund the future of Intel.
That's American capitalism.
Looking at Google's recent antitrust settlement, I'm not sure this is true at present.
Google search is genuinely being threatened.
Google is not a monopoly, not entirely.
If AI usage also starts accruing to Google then there should be a new antitrust suit.
https://www.theregister.com/1998/10/29/microsoft_paid_apple_...
> handwritten note by Fred Anderson, Apple's CFO, in which Anderson wrote that "the [QuickTime] patent dispute was resolved with cross-licence and significant payment to Apple." The payment was $150 million
Quicktime got stolen by an ex-Apple employee & in return Apple had Microsoft commit money & promise to have Office suite available on macOS/OS X
[0] https://thisdayintechhistory.com/12/06/apple-sues-over-quick...
Nvidia is leaning more into data centres, but lack a CPU architecture or expertise. Intel is struggling financially, but have knowledge in iGPUs and a vast amount of patents.
They could have alot to give one another, and it's a massive win if it keeps intel afloat.