Something is wrong with my generation, i.e. what happened to the social network
pressbuttongoboink.com
pressbuttongoboink.com
It's that people use their social network of choice to make others believe they have interesting, fascinating, exciting lives whether it's true or not. The more effort a person puts into this the less interesting they actually are in real life but you wouldn't know it by looking at their Facebook page. Insecurity plays a big part in this. Some of the most shallow, hollow, unhappy people I know have Facebook timelines that make them seem as though they are living the dream when in reality they truly hate themselves. I'm not trying to disparage them - they really do hate themselves, they've told me so and see therapists about it.
Now that we have Internet celebrities who've built a brand everyone wants to do it too. And it's not hard. All you need is any common smartphone. It's about building a fantasy life. On the web it's easy to play pretend and give off certain impressions. Some people take it to the point where they believe their own myths. These are the most uninteresting people in the world with, ironically, the most interesting social network profiles in the world.
Not going to lie, the places online where I feel most social are anonymous boards like 4chan. Which is the polar opposite of a social network.
As we all do, I know people in person with whom I'm connected on social media. In person, they know there's a social contract and they abide by it. They refuse to drone on with detailed trivia, because there'd be a price to pay, socially, and they're rather not pay it. But they check in on foursquare, relay that to twitter. They post what they're having at chipotle, which is not a unique gourmet experience. Ad nauseam.
They would not dream of doing this in person because it would make them a boor. Yes, a boor. Let's not mince words. They know it. We all know it. The only people who do this in person actually are boors.
But somehow it's OK if it's on social media? No, it's not OK. It's still boorish.
Also, this is a perfect example of the kind of shit that's permissible in on Quora, but not permissible in a room filled with 500 people. Sure it's great intended use of the website, but is it intended use of the user?
http://www.quora.com/Seattle-WA/Who-are-some-entrepreneurshi...
I think the problem is when you privilege performance over intimacy, which privately owned and operated social networks have incentives to do.
Which is one of the many reasons I'm rooting for a decentralized, distributed social networking solution. I've got high hopes for tent.io, for example.
--from the Satyricon of Petronius, a Roman satirist of the 1st century AD.
People have been talking about food for a long time...only the medium changes.
The majority of folks' lives, outside the small percentage of people you would actually want to follow, are just: Eating, Shitting & Fucking.
Shitting == Too gross to document unless it's a prank. Fucking == Too exhibitionistic for most & social networks' TOS seem to frown on that sorta stuff.
That leaves Eating... Nice, safe, normal. Boring.
Or maybe we're all (aka any app ever made) just projecting how people should behave. If you think this is about food, then I think you're missing the point.
We need to stop seeing social networks as a way augment real life, and more a way to capture life as it is. We're so connected to the internet now anyways that there are very few places left where the internet provides any honest solitude. Even gaming is changing like this with professional circuits, tournaments, yet there are high ranked gamers who don't want to participate because they don't want to be in the public.
I just happen to be a recent college grad. Go back a few years and instead of food pictures, it's drunken party pictures.
Same exact thing, except a bunch of 18 year old kids goofing off with a camera and alcohol.
But if you go back a bit earlier, when Facebook hadn't yet blown up, the content was very different. There were status updates on relationships. People helping eachother with homework. News articles that people liked. Conversation threads. Funny jokes. All of it without fear of judgement.
This could be the fact that I've grown up and many of my cohort don't have the same time for those activities. And also the fact that a real identity has much to do with it. But I think it's just that the way we view social networks has changed. And not in the direction that most founders/investors/really big socially connected visionaries realize. Yet that's where they promise big $$.
I want to see someone giving to a project they like on Kickstarter. I want to see someone learning something new. I want to see someone build something. I want to my friends meeting new people and where they met them. I want to see people's accomplishments. I want to see someone vote. I want to see people's fears. I want to see if someone's life has been impacted. If I'm on a social network for my life, I want to see real life.
I don't really want to see pictures of food.
But we can't. It is like the Heisenberg principle for social life. As soon as we start recording and observing things and post them on Facebook, Instagram, Foursquare etc. it changes and becomes different. People start doing things just to post and broadcast to others. Others react by changing their behavior based on what was posted by others.
brb, give me a few years. Once people have fatigued from the social norms of current social media sites, I should have this app finished.
2) Food is fun to look at. Mmm, foood.
3) It hits the lowest common denominator. Everybody eats.
Yes, it looks a bit boring and shallow. It's broadcast, so it has to be. I bet the OP has some really interesting IM conversations with real friends, but anything in the newsfeed is going to be crap.
Why can't people just impulsively think that their food is photogenic and cool and take pictures of it? The author has no right to determine what is meaningful because that is the point of the social NETWORK. The rest of the population determines what they think is meaningful, and they shove it down everyone's throats. It's not a status symbol. It's just how people talk on the internet nowadays.
What do you expect, am I going to post a picture of myself sitting and watching TV so you can see the "real me?" Post about my insecurities? Or should I only post when I've discovered a cure for cancer, or some other event of great importance? Sounds boring to me.
Some people like food. Some people like cars. Some people are obsessed with their kids. Some are political. Some people are amateur sports commentators on Facebook. Whatever is cool with me, I get to see what you're all about. If I personally find your posts boring or obnoxious then I put you in the "important updates only" category.
The interesting thing here (to me at least) is that there is an implication that you _have_ to post.
I think there's an assumption here that 1) everyone taking photos are posting them to a social network (I probably only post 5% of my photos anywhere), and 2) that this is inherently distasteful. People like food, and people like sharing experiences with their friends.
This is basically telling a story. Remember that Instagram or Foursquare will tag where you at- I think a lot of times it's not about "here's what I ate" and more "check out where I am". A lot of discussions can be had surrounding the story of where rather than what.
the only difference is we take pics of our food after it's prepared while they drew pics of their food in it's pre-prepared state.
It's so easy, in case things go bad and, say, a war starts, to fight against other categories. Think cartoons making fun of jews in the 1930's -> the holocaust.
Absent supporting data, the bit about asian friends seems a bit prejudiced.
"we were supposed to be sharing meaningful content" - What, who decided that's what we are supposed to do?
Why would communication with friends through the internet would be any more meaningful than communication with friends through other means? Why was it better that people in the 90s showed off their new toys face to face instead of face to face and on Facebook?
Maybe "look at how much more sophisticated I am than the 'normal' people" is the insecure-hacker version of "look at what a cool lunch I had."
I think if you look around you'll still see plenty of people who very much enjoy food without feeling the need to snap pics, even if they Asian ;).
That's not the only point though. People are shallow and over time due to cultural conventions they have been conditioned to tone it down. People who yell "Hey everyone, I just ate a $30 hamburger! Check out how awesome I am!" in a group of friends in real life will quickly find out they don't have many friends left. So there is a bit of feedback and regulation of this tendency. Online social networks don't have that feedback, everyone broadcasts shit nobody cares about but they is usually no feedback (say body language) that would let the person know "yeah nobody cares, stop bragging, it is obnoxious".
There have also been some interesting comments here that I enjoyed, so I don't quite get the "ashamed" part.
Are social networks enabling this bad behavior to a greater extent than before? I doubt it.
The threads here seem to be a combination of uninformed, speculative, and pointless. The irony of engaging in shallow internet discussion to complain about people using the internet for shallow activities appears to be lost on basically everybody.