Glad for the guy, but here are a bit different view on the same QVO series:
Device Model: Samsung SSD 870 QVO 1TB
User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes [1.00 TB]
== /dev/sda
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age Always - 40779
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 059 059 000 Pre-fail Always - 406
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 354606366027
== /dev/sdb
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age Always - 40779
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 060 060 000 Pre-fail Always - 402
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 354366033251
== /dev/sdc
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age Always - 40779
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 059 059 000 Pre-fail Always - 409
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 352861545042
== /dev/sdd
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age Always - 40778
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 060 060 000 Pre-fail Always - 403
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 354937764042
== /dev/sde
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age Always - 40779
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 059 059 000 Pre-fail Always - 408
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 353743891717
NB you need to look at the first decimal number in 177 Wear_Leveling_Count to get the 'remaining endurance percent' value, ie 59 and 60 hereWhile overall it's not that bad, losing only 40% after 4.5 years - it means what in another 3-4 years it would be down to 20% if the usage pattern wouldn't change and the system wouldn't hit the write amplification. Sure, someone had that "brilliant" idea ~5 years ago to use a desktop grade QLC flash as a ZFS storage for PVE...