Maybe I have a coupon? Is the price really the part of this that sticks in your craw?
>If you're going to base your argument on the first few words you can't win against the opposition does the same with the last part.
I'm fine with not infringing on the well regulated militias rights. Exactly as it was written.
It was the price and also the reference to WMDs. You can't get WMDs at all so the price part is irrelevant.
> I'm fine with not infringing on the well regulated militias rights. Exactly as it was written.
That's also a cherry-picking way to interpret that line. You're intentionally leaving out the part that is inconvenient to your opinion.
How many deaths per minute do you consider the minimum to qualify as a WMD? There are probably several firearms legally available that can meet it.
> That's also a cherry-picking way to interpret that line.
See my other post beneath this grandparent. It's long, but a bit more nuanaced.
It's objectively clear what the founding fathers meant, and it wasn't "lunatics should be able to buy guns without a drug test first" as the NRA seems to think.