I never said I opposed a subsidy to encourage stay-at-home parenting. By all means, we should propose it and study its pros and cons.
But the lack of that subsidy should not cause someone to oppose a paid-childcare subsidy.
But the lack of that subsidy should not cause someone to oppose a paid-childcare subsidy.
> I just don't understand this mentality.
I don't understand. Wasn't your original comment opposing an equal value waiver?