I thought Google was supposed to be a geeky company.
I thought Google was supposed to be a geeky company.
As for a "Bacon Number"... I'm giving myself a 1. I actually have a plate of bacon sitting right next to me, and that's the bacon that matters the most.
EDIT: As per jerf (good catch!), I can confirm that I am not actually bacon. I changed my "bacon number" above from 0 to 1.
Yes, true, but by not being actually interesting as the Erdös numbers are, this makes it ... interesting. Sort of like the least interesting number, which ... oh, I'm sure you follow. :)
http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/collaborationDistance.html
using the MathSciNet reference database. Unfortuately, it is only accessible to MathSciNet subscribers, so basically on all university campuses or libraries.
My Erdos number is no higher than 5 :-).
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/VisualExplorer
(The gimmick is that Erdos is the default for the co-author path visualization)
http://www.freebase.com/view/en/computer_scientist/-/people/...
The more important piece thats missing is the one that Journals need to contribute - papers and author lists. ;)
It would be surprising to see any suit to enforce the licensing restrictions on a database built from user contributions like IMDB actually go to trial.
We might come away with some interesting answers to the questions of what licensing terms on such databases are truly enforceable (as opposed to mere intimidation).
What happened to that Craigslist lawsuit? How is that progressing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93Bacon_number