Freedom on choice, my friend.
Countries that decide what’s good and what’s bad for its people, they usually tend to tyranny in the end.
I could make some recent examples.
Countries that decide what’s good and what’s bad for its people, they usually tend to tyranny in the end.
I could make some recent examples.
Legitimate question. Killing someone = bad. Poisoning people with whack medicine = bad. Causing loneliness and mental health epidemic = good ??
Societies have always decided what is and isn't allowed.
So we're not regulating every possible negative outcome. We're only blocking some that are "too" negative. Where's the line? It moves over time, and it changes from area to area. Food, for example, is regulated as to poison, but not as to just being junk.
We have the freedom of not living in a nanny state. Not everything that can cause harm is forbidden.