The article sure could use a picture.
Edit: now that I realize from the article its 16" circumference it's less surprising, and I can imagine what it would look like. The title should mention it is circumference.
Edit: now that I realize from the article its 16" circumference it's less surprising, and I can imagine what it would look like. The title should mention it is circumference.
> Game play for 16-inch softball is mostly consistent with standard softball game play. In contrast to standard, or 12-inch (30.48 cm) softball, it is played with a ball 16 inches (40.64 cm) in circumference.
FWIW, softballs by are sold by their circumference, so it would be unconventional (and unwieldy) to change the page title to "16-inch circumference softball". And I mean, it should be obvious.
(I agree a photo would help and wiki pages are easy to edit, but I looked for a creative commons licensed 16" softball photo and couldn't find one.)
A softball like 10% bigger isn't that interesting.
I don't remember ever using a bat with a kickball, other than for laughs. It would work, though.
Reminds me about this thread about goats: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32191140
also, a "16-in circumference softball" article still wouldn't even be allowed into the EU as it's not metric.
That's a pretty, uhm, big ball. I imagine it'd be highly entertaining to see the Savannah Bananas play with these 16 inchers!
https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/08/NYPICH...