And my cat will yell before his dinner time. We all have useless impulses. The question is if it accomplishes anything.
Also, you didn’t suspect anything. A language model thought for you. Your role was in copying and pasting. Not understanding or commanding.
> disagree with your analysis of the fallacies that the AI identified
Sure.
For what it’s worth, I ran your comment—over drinks—past a professor of philosophy who has published peer-reviewed research out of Columbia. He said I was too gentle. It’s gibberish of a form that wouldn’t make it past undergrad formal logic.
We have no doubt you and plenty of others will regurgitate AI tripe with confidence. (This happened with television and organised religion in the past.) And I’ll admit I haven’t found, yet, how to profit off that common temptation other than investing in the companies that facilitate it. But I think I will, because folks who will double down on hallucinated constructs are commonplace.
> can you all please tell me just one more time that the "appeal to corporate omniscience" isn't in the Wikipedia list of fallacies
It’s in no philosophy text, either. Because it is, in itself, an appeal to authority. (Incorporation isn’t a logical primitive. It is a social construct.)
> which is just as arbitrary a source as a good LLM
To the extent a peer-reviewed paper is the same as a grad student, sure.
(There is also rich irony in a corporate LLM hallucinating a fallacy about corporate omniscience. The stupid part, here, is the doubling down.)