Each word has nearly 5 billion calculations behind its choice. Why would an expert not use LLMs to graft their responses to the repository of human knowledge?
If you mean "the words picked by LLMs have nearly 5 billion calculations behind", then the reply is simply "LLMs are easily effing morons" - those calculations must be not well spent or not enough.
And in the example, the paid «expert» (which is actually meant to be "the professional" - expert, talented and educated) is the human, not the machine.