That's also what he writes in the article, I.e. LLMs are large language models, so the approach is generally flawed. A sentiment I agree with.
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The current hype is now officially insane.
That's not the definition of insanity.
Um, it's a famous quote.
Do you not see the irony in parroting a quote that is quite clearly an inaccurate representation of reality to argue in favor of LLMs?
I see extreme irony being lectured about reality by a person who believes I'm shilling LLMs. It doesn't make any sense, are you sure you're not an LLM?