Hacker News Reader

How exactly do you presume to make an argument about thought and whether or an LLM exhibits genuine thought and intelligence without philosophy?

Not to mention the effect of formal logic in computer science

By comparing measurable performance metrics and examining what little we know of the internal representations.

If you don't have anything measurable, you don't have anything at all. And philosophy doesn't deal in measurables.

How do you know what is, isn't, could be, or couldn't be measurable?

You're not being serious.